Boohoo Returns to Profit as Debenhams Growth and Asset Sales Reshape Turnaround
Boohoo made £28m profit on lower revenue, while Debenhams grew 14%. Asset sales are expected to leave net debt negligible at year-end.


Boohoo’s return to pre-tax profit gives its turnaround a firmer financial measure, but the half-year figures also show why the business still has work to do: revenue fell even as profitability improved. The online retailer made £28m in the six months to the end of August, compared with a £18m loss a year earlier, while revenue edged down three per cent to £410m.
The company says its plans are “significantly ahead” of schedule. It is targeting £100m of pre-tax profit and “significant cash” in the medium term. That ambition rests on a mix of cost reductions, asset sales and changes to how the group operates its brands. The latest results show a return to profit; they don’t yet show that revenue has resumed growing across the business.
Different brands, different trajectories
Debenhams was the strongest of the named businesses in the period, with revenue up 14 per cent to £364m. Takings at Boohoo and Pretty Little Thing edged up one per cent to £369m. The group said combining the management teams behind Boohoo and Pretty Little Thing had brought “visible benefits in young fashion womenswear”.
That modest increase contrasts with the Debenhams growth figure and the continued contraction at BoohooMan. Sales at BoohooMan fell by more than a quarter to £80m. Boohoo said the brand is declining at a slower rate and delivering better profitability, a distinction that matters: improved margins can help the group’s profit even while sales shrink, but they don’t by themselves reverse that decline.
The brand mix therefore offers a more complicated picture than the headline profit return. Debenhams’ growth and the slight increase at Boohoo and Pretty Little Thing are supporting the group, while BoohooMan remains under pressure. The source figures do not break out how much each brand contributed to group profit, so they cannot establish which businesses drove the improvement in the overall result.
Cost cuts and asset disposals
Since becoming group chief executive in 2024, Dan Finley has pursued disposals of what the company considers non-essential parts of the business. Boohoo has sold a Sheffield warehouse to Primark for £90m and sold its Nasty Gal brand for £12m. The company said the transactions would materially reduce group debt and that net debt was expected to be negligible at year-end.
Those sales provide cash and reduce the assets Boohoo owns, while its operating changes are intended to make the remaining business more profitable. For investors and other stakeholders, the year-end debt position will be a useful measure of whether the disposals have eased the balance-sheet pressure. The £100m pre-tax profit ambition is a separate test: reaching it will depend on profit growth, not just on proceeds from selling assets.
The logistics plan has also changed. Boohoo had earmarked its Burnley warehouse for sale, but now says it will become the group’s new fulfilment hub after the company exits Sheffield early next year. GXO will run the operation, which is expected to create 1,200 jobs. The shift means the Sheffield sale is paired with a new fulfilment arrangement at Burnley, rather than an exit from warehouse operations altogether.
What the return to profit establishes
Finley called the result the group’s first positive pre-tax profit since August 2021 and said the expected year-end net debt was “significantly ahead” of the company’s original guidance at the start of the year. He also pointed to “material opportunities ahead”, while saying the company was focused on maximising them.
The company has already taken steps to reduce debt through a £35m fundraising from investors in February. Boohoo said the money would be used to cut debt. The fundraising came as the group faced pressure from Mike Ashley and Frasers Group, which criticised executive pay arrangements and tried unsuccessfully to take control of Boohoo’s board. That dispute adds to the company’s competing demands: it must improve trading and profitability while addressing questions about how the business is run.
Analysts at Panmure Liberum described the pace of change over the past year as “breathtaking” and said the profitability increase put Boohoo on course for a near-£50m pre-tax profit by the end of the decade. That is an analyst view, while the company’s stated ambition is £100m in the medium term. The two figures refer to different expectations and time frames; neither removes the execution risk in a business whose revenue has slipped and whose brands are performing unevenly.
Competition from fast-fashion sellers including Shein and Temu has been one pressure on Boohoo in recent years. Its shift towards operating as an online platform for third-party brands, together with cost cutting and disposals, is intended to reset the business. The next evidence will come from whether revenue stabilises, whether BoohooMan’s slower decline continues, and whether the expected debt reduction and improved profit can be sustained as the group adjusts its operations.